Chapter 4: Investment
|
|
Objective
APEC economies will achieve free and open investment in the Asia-Pacific
region by:
a.
liberalizing
their respective investment regimes and the overall APEC investment
environment by, inter-alia, progressively providing for MFN treatment and
national treatment and ensuring transparency; and b.
facilitating
investment activities through, inter-alia, technical assistance and
cooperation, including exchange of information on investment opportunities. |
|
Guidelines
Each APEC economy will: a.
progressively reduce or eliminate exceptions and restrictions to
achieve the above objective, using as an initial framework the WTO Agreement,
the APEC Non-Binding Investment Principles, any other international
agreements relevant to that economy, and any commonly agreed guidelines
developed in APEC including the Menu of Options for Investment Liberalization and
Business Facilitation; b. seek to expand APEC’s network of
bilateral and regional investment agreements and contribute to multilateral
work on investment; c. facilitate investment flows within the Asia-Pacific region through promoting awareness of investment opportunities, enhancing market access conducive to investment, undertaking capacity building and technical cooperation activities, and implementing measures such as those in the Menu of Options; and d. examine
ways to incorporate new investment forms and activities for the sound and sustainable economic growth and
development of the Asia-Pacific region including investment forms and
activities that support the new economy. |
Collective Actions
APEC economies will: 1. Transparency Short-terma. Increase the transparency of APEC
investment regimes by: (i) Updating the APEC
Guidebook on Investment Regimes; (ii) Establishing
software networks on investment regulation and investment opportunities; (iii) Improving the state
of statistical reporting and data collection; and (iv) Increasing
understanding among member economies on investment policy-making issues. 2. Policy Dialogue Short-term b. Promote dialogue with the APEC
business community on ways to improve the APEC investment environment. c. Continue a
dialogue with appropriate international
organizations
dealing with global and
regional investment issues. 3. Study and Evaluation Short-term d. Define
and implement follow-on training to the WTO
implementation seminars; e. Undertake an evaluation of the role of investment liberalization in economic development in the Asia-Pacific region. f. Study possible common elements between existing subregional arrangements relevant to investment. Medium-termg. Refine APEC’s understanding of free
and open investment. Long-termh. Assess the merits of developing an APEC-wide discipline on investment in the light of APEC’s own progress through the medium-term, as well as developments in other international fora. i. Study the advantages and disadvantages of creating
investment rules – bilateral, regional, or multilateral – with a view to
fostering a more favorable investment environment in the Asia- Pacific
region. 4. Facilitation Short-term
and continuing j. Undertake practical facilitation initiatives by: (i) Progressively
working towards reducing impediments to investments including those
investments related to e-commerce; (ii) Undertaking the
business facilitation measures to strengthen APEC economies; and (iii) Initiating
investment promotion and facilitation activities to enhance investment flow
within APEC economies. 5.
Economic and
Technical Cooperation Short-term k. Identify ongoing technical cooperation needs in the Asia-Pacific region and organize training programs which will assist APEC economies in fulfilling APEC investment objectives. 6.
Capacity
Building Initiatives l. Undertake new activities that contribute to capacity building. 7.
Menu of
Options m. Ongoing
improvement of the Menu of Options. The current CAP relating to investment can be found in
the Investment
Collective Action Plan.
|
Canada’s Approach to
Investment in 2003
Canada relies heavily on foreign
investment to further its economic development. Foreign direct investment
generates benefits to Canadian communities through increased trade
opportunities, the introduction of new technologies and management practices,
job creation, the payment of taxes and the purchase of goods and services
locally. Canada actively seeks to promote its advantages as an investment
destination. In areas of special sensitivity, certain restrictions exist. For further information on Canada’s
general approach to investment, please visit: http://www.dfait-maeci.gc.ca/t or contact: Donna Allen Industry Canada Tel : 613-954-3562 allen.donna@ic.g.c.ca Milan Konopek Department of Foreign Affairs and
International Trade Tel.
613-992-7881 milan.konopek@dfait-maeci.gc.ca |
Canada’s Approach to Investment Measures in 2003 |
|||
Section
|
Improvements Implemented Since Last
IAP |
Current Investment Measures Applied |
Further Improvements Planned |
|
General Policy Framework |
(1.04 - 1.07) The review thresholds of the
Investment Canada Act (ICA) are adjusted for inflation every year. In 2000, the threshold was CDN$192
million, in 2001 it was CDN$209 million, in 2002 it was CDN$218 million and
in 2003 it is CDN$223 million. |
(1.01
- 1.03) Canada relies heavily on foreign investment to further its economic
development. Foreign direct investment generates benefits to Canadian
communities through increased trade opportunities, the introduction
of new technologies and management practices, job creation, the payment of
taxes and the purchase of goods and services locally. Canada actively seeks to promote its
advantages as an investment destination.
Foreign investment promotion is carried out by Investment Partnerships
Canada. (1.04 - 1.07) The only
domestic law of general application with respect to foreign investment is the
Investment Canada Act (the Act). Under the
Act, the establishment of a new business in Canada by an investor making its
first investment in Canada or the establishment of a new business by an
existing investor where the new business is unrelated to any existing
business in Canada is subject to a straightforward notification procedure,
but is not generally subject to review. The ICA reflects Canada's policy of
welcoming international investment and of working to attract quality
investment to all regions of Canada. At the same time, to ensure that such
investment will be of net benefit to Canada, the ICA contains provisions for
the review of certain acquisitions of control of Canadian businesses by
foreign investors above a certain threshold (see below) and the establishment
of new businesses in industries related to Canada's national identity or
cultural heritage. To encourage investment by non-Canadians, Canadian
government officials work with potential non-Canadian investors to help them
develop investment plans and undertakings that will comply with relevant
policies and fully satisfy the net benefit criterion. Except in sensitive
sectors as set out in subsequent paragraphs, where either the non-Canadian
investor or vendor is ultimately controlled out of a World Trade Organization
(WTO) country other than Canada, only the direct acquisition of control of a
Canadian business that has assets equal to or greater than Can$223 million
(for 2003) is a reviewable transaction. This figure is adjusted annually to
reflect economic growth in Canada. Where both the
non-Canadian investor and vendor are ultimately controlled out of a non-WTO
country, the direct acquisition of control of a Canadian business that has
assets greater than Can$5 million is reviewable, and the indirect acquisition
of control of a Canadian business with assets greater than Can$50 million is
reviewable, or Can$5 million where 50 percent or more of the total assets of
the business acquired are located in Canada. These review thresholds are
fixed and are not adjusted. The acquisition of a
Canadian business involved in the sensitive areas of cultural industries,
financial services, transportation services or uranium production is subject
to the lower thresholds regardless of the nationality of the investor or
vendor. Acquisitions in cultural industries (i.e., publication and
distribution of books, magazines, newspapers, videos, music recordings, etc.)
below these thresholds and the establishment of new businesses in these
cultural industries may be reviewable, if the Government so decides.
Reviewable investments are allowed to proceed if they are likely to be of
'net benefit' to Canada. For further
information:
http://investcan.ic.gc.ca (1.08) As a WTO member, Canada adheres to the
obligations of the WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Investment Measures
(TRIMs.) Canada is also a party to
the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), Canada-Chile Free Trade
Agreement (CCFTA)which include obligations on investment, and the
Canada-Costa Rica Free Trade Agreement (CCRFTA) which did not include an
investment chapter because of the existence of a bilateral investment treaty
(FIPA) with Costa Rica. Canada also
adheres to the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, a set of
voluntary standards of conduct recommended by Member governments regarding
the operations of these enterprises in OECD markets. (1.09) Canada has concluded twenty-one Foreign
Investment Protection Agreements (FIPAs) since the beginning of the program
in 1989. FIPAs are bilateral,
reciprocal agreements designed to protect and promote Canada's foreign
investments abroad, particularly in developing economies, through a framework
of legally-binding rights and obligations.
For FIPA listing see: http://www.dfait-maeci.gc.ca/t |
(1.04
- 1.07) The thresholds of the Investment Canada Act (ICA) will be adjusted
annually. (1.08)
Canada and members of the Andean community (Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru
and Venezuela) have held preliminary talks on a proposed free trade
agreement. Canada is currently participating in investment negotiations under
the FTAA negotiations, with the Central American countries Nicaragua, El
Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras under the Canada-CA4 FTA negotiations and
bilaterally with Singapore under the Canada-Singapore FTA negotiations. Canada is continuing to work with its
NAFTA partners on the implementation and clarification of the investment
provisions of the Agreement. Canada is actively participating in the ongoing
discussions in the WTO Working Group on the relationship between Trade and
Investment regarding a prospective multilateral framework of investment rules
pursuant to the WTO Ministerial Declaration at Doha. (1.09) Canada is continuing to engage in
discussions with priority countries with regard to possible bilateral
investment agreements (FIPAs). |
|
Transparency |
The
final form of regulations, after approval by Governor in
Council, are made public through publication in the Canada Gazette. Proposed
legislation or recent legislative amendments and enactments, can be reviewed
in the Canada Gazette. To
determine the status of ongoing Bills in the House of Commons or the Senate,
visit the Government Bills page on the Parliamentary Internet site
(www.parl.gc.ca) The
Department of Justice Website site provides quick access to Statutes and
associated Regulations in text and compressed text formats. (http://canada.justice.gc.ca) Regulations
made under the Investment Canada Act are published in the Canada
Gazette. Government of Canada policy
is to allow for a public comment period with respect to new regulations. As a
matter of practice, any significant regulatory changes are discussed with the
industry sectors that would be affected by the changes and with the legal
community that represents companies in the sectors. Further
information on Canada’s investment policy and ongoing trade policy
initiatives, please visit: http://www.dfait-maeci.gc.ca/t |
Canada
and its NAFTA partners continue to work to clarify aspects of the NAFTA
chapter on investment based on their experience with its operation. |
|
|
|
In January 2003, the
Government of Canada initiated a review of the existing foreign investment
restrictions in the Telecom sector with a view to seeing if some of these
restrictions can be reduced without compromising Canada's national
interests. Consultations are
continuing with industry and consumer stakeholders. In 2001, the Canada
Business Corporations Act was amended to reduce the number of required
Canadian residents on the Boards of Directors of CBCA incorporated companies
from 50% to 25%. |
Canada’s
foreign investment laws are largely applied on an MFN and national treatment
basis. Canada has made substantive
investment commitments in the NAFTA and Canada-Chile Agreements. Any derogations from the principles of MFN
and national treatment are clearly identified in these
agreements. Selected
Investment Provisions by Sector The
Investment Canada Act (ICA) – see General Policy Framework for details.
Except for investments in the cultural sectors, the ICA applies only to acquisitions
of Canadian companies and not to greenfield investments. For further information, please visit:
http://icnet.ic.gc.ca/investca Canada
Business Corporations Act(CBCA) –Boards of Directors The Canada Business Corporations Act
requires, for most federally- incorporated corporations, that 25 per cent of
directors be resident Canadians. A simple majority of resident Canadian
directors is required for corporations in prescribed sectors. These sectors
include: uranium mining; book publishing or distribution; book sales, where
the sale of books is the primary part of the corporation’s business; and film
or video distribution. Corporations that, by an Act of Parliament or
Regulation, are individually subject to minimum Canadian ownership
requirements are required to have a majority of
resident Canadian directors. CBCA
– Issues, transfers, ownership of shares The Canadian Business Corporations
Act permits corporations to 'constrain' the issue, transfer and ownership of
shares in federally incorporated corporations. The object is to permit corporations
to meet Canadian ownership requirements, under certain laws set out in the
Canada Business Corporations Act Regulations, in sectors where such ownership
is required as a condition to operate or to receive licenses, permits,
grants, payments or other benefits. More information may be obtained by
accessing the website at http://competition.ic.gc.ca/ Federal
Fisheries Act Fish
processing companies which have more than 49% foreign ownership are not
permitted to hold Canadian commercial fishing licenses. There is no limit on
foreign ownership of fish processing companies that do not hold fishing
licences. Foreign
fishing vessels are prohibited from entering Canada’s Exclusive Economic Zone
except under authority of a licence or under treaty. Foreign vessels are
those which are not ‘Canadian’ as defined in legislation. The Minister of
Fisheries and Oceans has discretionary authority with respect to the issuance
of licenses For further information,
please visit:
http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/i Canada
Transport Act – For more details see Canada’s entry in the APEC Investment
Guidebook – 5th Edition or visit: http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/i Book
Publishing and Distribution Investment Policy Guidelines Foreign
investment in new businesses is limited to Canadian-controlled joint
ventures. Foreign acquisition of existing Canadian-controlled businesses is
allowed only if: a) the business is
in clear financial distress and; b)Canadians have had full and fair
opportunity to purchase. Indirect
acquisitions are permissible subject to a net benefit test . For further information, please visit:
http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/ac- Broadcasting
Investment Policy Guidelines Broadcasting
in Canada includes both broadcasting programming (e.g. 'over the air'
broadcasting, pay and specialty services, video on demand) and broadcasting
distribution (e.g. cable, direct-to-home satellite and wireless). Legislation
(the Broadcasting Act) requires that the Canadian broadcasting system be
effectively owned and controlled by Canadians. A Directive by the Governor-in-Council limits foreign ownership
to 20% of voting shares in a licensee and 33 1/3 % of voting shares in the
case of holding companies. Therefore,
foreign ownership can comprise 46.7% of a Canadian broadcasting licensee both
directly and indirectly (20% directly, plus 33% of the Canadian holding
company which owns the remaining 80% of the licensee). There are no restrictions on foreign
ownership of non-voting shares in a holding company or licensee. In addition,
the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) plus 80% of the Board of Directors of a
company, which directly holds a broadcasting license, must be Canadian. More
info : Broadcasting
Act - http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/B Direction
to the CRTC (Ineligibility of non-Canadians) http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/LEGA Film
Distribution Investment Policy Guidelines Foreign
acquisition of a Canadian controlled distributor is not allowed. Foreign Investments in new distribution
business is permissible only for importation and distribution of proprietary
products (the importer owns world rights or is a major investor). Direct or
indirect acquisition of foreign distribution businesses in Canada by
foreign-owned companies is permissible only if the investor undertakes to
reinvest a portion of its Canadian earnings “in accordance with national and
cultural policies”. Periodical
Publishing Investment Policy Guidelines Foreign
investments in the periodical publishing sector, including investments to
establish or, directly indirectly, acquire foreign businesses to produce and
sell periodicals in Canada and to access the Canadian advertising services
market must meet the net benefit test, which includes a commitment to the
production of majority Canadian editorial content. Foreign acquisitions of
Canadian-owned and Canadian-controlled periodical publishing businesses are
not permitted. Financial
Services In
Canada there are three classes of banks, based on size of equity, for the
purposes of determining ownership restrictions: small (less than Can$1
billion), medium (Can$1 billion-Can$5 billion) and large (greater than Can$5
billion). Large banks must remain widely
held (investor, whether Canadian or foreign, may own up to 20% any class of
voting shares and 30% any class non-voting shares). Medium size banks are
allowed to be closely held, but must have a public float of 35% of voting
shares. Small banks have no ownership restrictions other than "fit and
proper" tests. Further information can be
found at the Department of Finance, Canada website: http://www.fin.gc.ca Telecommunications
Act Foreign
ownership of Canadian common carriers is limited to 20% ownership, 33% indirect
and 46.7% combined direct and indirect foreign ownership of voting
shares. For further information,
please visit: http://www.laws.justice.gc.ca/ Uranium A
minimum level of resident ownership in individual uranium mining properties
of 51% at the stage of first production is required. Exceptions to this limit
may be permitted if it can be established that the property is in fact
‘Canadian‑controlled’ (as defined in the Investment Canada Act). While
these limits apply to the control of production facilities, there are no
limits applied to foreign investment in exploration and development. |
Telecommunications
Review In
January 2003, the Government of Canada initiated a review of the existing
foreign investment restrictions in the Telecom sector with a view to seeing
if some of these restrictions can be reduced without compromising Canada's
national interests. Consultations are
continuing with industry and consumer stakeholders. |
|
Expropriation and Compensation |
|
Both at the
federal and provincial levels, there exists legislation which gives authority
to expropriate for a public purpose in accordance with due process of law,
subject to compensation. In all circumstances, a fair and equitable legal
process is available to the expropriated party for the determination of
compensation. Authorities
first attempt to reach agreement on appropriate compensation, failing which
the action is subject to the judicial process. Compensation is based on fair
market value. Valuation criteria are determined by the courts and can include
such things as asset value, going concern value, and other criteria. |
|
|
Protection from Strife and Similar Events |
|
In the investment chapters of the
NAFTA and Canada-Chile Free Trade Agreement Agreements,
Canada has committed to according to investors of another Party, and to
investments of investors of another Party, non-discriminatory treatment with
respect to measures it adopts or maintains relating to losses suffered by
investments in its territory owing to armed conflict or civil strife. Canada
has also made commitments on compensation for losses within its bilateral
Foreign Investment Protection
Agreements. |
|
|
Transfers of capital related to investments |
|
Canada permits transfers relating to
investments to be made freely and without delay. Please
see NAFTA Article 1109 for further details at:
http://www.dfait-maeci.gc.ca/n |
|
|
|
|
Canada adheres to the obligations of
the WTO Agreement on Trade Related Investment Measures. Canada has made additional and more
rigorous commitments on performance requirements within the NAFTA and Canada-Chile Free Trade Agreements. Canada also has made performance
requirements commitments in each of its
bilateral Foreign Investment Protection Agreements. Please
see NAFTA Article 1106 for further details at:
http://www.dfait-maeci.gc.ca/n |
|
|
|
Canada
has participated in meetings of the Business Mobility group to share information on visa regimes. Under
the new Immigration and Refugee Protection Act which came into force on June
28th 2002, Canada revised its Temporary Foreign Worker Program regulations to
further streamline and improve efficiency. |
To
facilitate information exchange, CIC maintains a website which provides
information on visiting Canada. It
can be accessed at
http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/v Information
specific to APEC economies can be found in Canada's entry in the APEC
Business Travel Handbook:
http://www.apecsec.org.sg/trav Short
Term Business Entry In
general, business people entering Canada for short term visits require a
visitor visa. Exempt APEC economies
include Australia, Brunei, Hong Kong, China (HK, SAR,and HK BNO passport
holders), Japan, South Korea, Mexico, New Zealand, Papau New Guinea,
Singapore and the United States.
Canada issues multiple entry visas for up to five years or the life of
the passport, whichever is longer, but they are not granted
automatically. Upon arrival in
Canada, entry can be granted for a stay of up to 6 months. The duration of stay may be extended once
the person is in Canada. For further
information, please visit: http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/v Business
Temporary Residency Citizens
from all APEC economies are required to apply for an employment authorization
to enter Canada for temporary business residency. Depending on the circumstances of the individuals involved,
there are several mechanisms to obtain an employment authorization for
temporary business residency. The
manual on Canada's current Temporary
Foreign Worker guidelines can be found at:
http://www.cic.gc.ca/manuals-g |
For
further improvements planned, please visit Canada’s IAP
chapter on Mobility of Business People. |
|
|
|
Foreign and national investors have
equal access to legal procedures in Canada.
In addition, under the NAFTA and Canada - Chile Free Trade Agreement,
as well as the FIPAs, disputes with respect to investment
obligations may be reffered to investor-state dispute settlement. Canada
is a party to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of the
Foreign Arbitral Awards (the "New York Convention") done at New
York, June 10, 1958. It entered into
force for Canada on May 12, 1986. The
British Columbia International Arbitration Centre (Vancouver, B.C.) and the
Quebec National and International Commercial Arbitration Centre (Montreal,
Que) offer services that may be accessed by foreign investors. While
Canada has not signed or acceded to the ICSID Convention, Canada provides for
use of the ICSID Additional Facility Rules and the Arbitration Rules of
UNCITRAL in its bilateral investment agreements, the NAFTA and the
Canada-Chile FTA. |
|
|
Intellectual Property |
For
improvements implemented since last IAP,
please visit Canada’s IAP chapter on Intellectual Property Rights. |
Canada
supports effective intellectual property rights protection that provide certainty and transparency to encourage marketing of goods,
services, technology and entertainment; investment in R&D and innovation;
and licensing arrangements (transfer of technology) to establish or expand
existing business investment. Canada
continues to improve intellectual property laws and their administration, to
ensure adequate protection for owners of intellectual property, including
effective mechanisms for enforcement of rights. For
further information, please visit Canada's IAP chapter on Intellectual
Property Rights. For
further information regarding the administration and registration of
intellectual property laws, please visit: http://cipo.gc.ca; and
regarding intellectual property policies, please visit:
http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/SSG/ http://www.pch.gc.ca/culture/c http://www.dfait-maeci.gc.ca/t |
For
further improvements planned, please visit Canada’s IAP chapter on
Intellectual Property Rights. |
|
|
The
following Double Taxation Agreeements came into force since 2001: Moldova, Mongolia, Norway, and Peru. The
Protocol Amending the Tax Convention Between Canada and Australia came into
force December 30, 2002. |
Canada
has double taxation agreements (DTAs) in force with the
following countries: Algeria, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Bangladesh,
Barbados, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Cameroon, Chile, Peoples Republic of
China, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Dominican Republic, Ecuador,
Egypt, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Guyana, Hungary, Iceland, India,
Indonesia, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Ivory Coast, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan,
Kazakhstan, Kenya, Republic of Korea, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Lithuania,
Luxembourg, Malaysia, Malta, Mexico, Moldova, Mongolia, Morocco, Netherlands,
New Zealand, Nigeria, Norway, Pakistan, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Philippines,
Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Singapore, South Africa, Slovak Republic,
Spain, Sri Lanka, Sweden, Switzerland, Tanzania, Thailand, Trinidad & Tobago,
Tunisia, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States, Uzbekistan, Vietnam, Zambia,
and Zimbabwe. For
further information, please visit:
http://www.fin.gc.ca/treaties/ |
|
|
Competition Policy and Regulatory
Reform |
For
improvements implemented since last IAP, please visit Canada’s IAP chapter on
Competition Policy. |
Canada's
principal laws aimed at the protection of competition are embodied in the
federal Competition Act. The Competition Act is a law of general application
which establishes basic principles for the conduct of
business in Canada. The purpose of the Act is to maintain and encourage
competition in Canada in order to promote the efficiency and adaptability of
the Canadian economy; expand opportunities for Canadian participation in
world markets while at the same time recognizing the role of foreign
competition in Canada; ensure that small and medium-sized enterprises have an
equitable opportunity to participate in the Canadian economy; and provide
consumers with competitive prices and product choices. All
mergers, whether involving foreign or domestic parties, which directly or
indirectly impact Canadian markets, are subject to review under the merger
provisions of the Competition Act.
This review determines whether or not the transaction is likely to
result in a substantial lessening or prevention of competition and could
ultimately result in an application before the Competition Tribunal for
remedial action. For
further information, please visit Canada’s IAP chapter on Competition Policy
or http://competition.ic.gc.ca/ |
For
further improvements planned, please visit Canada’s IAP chapter on
Competition Policy. |
|
Business Facilitating Measures to Improve
the Domestic Business Environment |
|
In response to the growing
recognition of the importance of foreign direct investment to the Canadian
economy, Canada's investment attraction and retention strategy consists of
five key features: - marketing Canada as the preferred
location for North American investment; - targeting new investments by
multinational corporations and offering customized servicing. The government
is targeting decision-makers in specific multinational companies with
strategic campaigns to influence their new investment decisions; - stimulating the formation of
international technology alliances and partnerships for SMEs. The government
is working to promote the growth of globally competitive companies by
introducing technology-based Canadian small and medium-sized companies to
international investment partners and opportunities; - improving Canada's investment
climate. The Canadian government is working to improve the investment climate
by taking note and addressing the concerns of both existing and potential
investors; and - new partnerships with the
provinces, municipalities, and the private sector. In Canada, provincial and municipal authorities compete among
themselves for international investment capital. Investors consider this healthy,
but it means that cooperation on investment initiatives is more difficult to
achieve unless mutual interests and opportunities for complementary efforts
are identified. The federal government continues to build partnerships with
provinces and municipalities, and to work with private-sector CEOs and labour
leaders to attract investment to various industry sectors. Through,
Investment Partnerships Canada (IPC), the Department of Foreign Affairs and
International Trade and Industry Canada are working to attract leading
international investment prospects.
An investor services team has been established to: - be a "one-stop-shop" for
foreign investors by providing immediate, accurate and personal responses to
information requests; - provide investors with the investment
information required, directly or through one of the many Canadian or
worldwide contacts; - develop international and NAFTA
business cost comparisons for your business case including taxes and wage
rates; - organize and facilitate meetings on
investment issues with ll relevant
public/private sector experts and multilateral partners; - identification of potential
strategic alliance partners; and - help solve problems and identify
opportunities after the investment. For more information,
please visit: http://investincanada.gc.ca |
For the latest information
on Investment Partnerships Canada and assistance available to new business
investors, please visit: http://investincanada.gc.ca |
|
|
|
A number of programs to assist
business are available to both Canadian and non-Canadian
businesses. Information
on government programs and services, (including incentive programs) can be
obtained by contacting any Canadian Embassy/High Commission or by contacting
the International FaxLink System, an automated fax delivery system used to
order publications from outside of Canada. Call from a touchtone fax machine
at (1 613) 944-6500. A master index of documents available via FaxLink
International may be ordered from the system. The
Government of Canada Primary Internet Site (Canada Site) is the Internet
electronic access point through which interested parties from around the
world can obtain information about Canada, its government and its programs
and services. Direct links are also provided from this site to government
departments and agencies that have Internet facilities. This website may be accessed at:
http://Canada.gc.ca/main_e.htm Information on investment
policies, Canada’s participation in international investment discussions and
Canadian investment agreements; and access to an extensive collection of
studies on the impact of FDI is
available on the Government of Canada International Investment Policy Website
at: http://intinvest.ic.gc.ca/ and on the
Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade - Trade
Negotiations and Agreements Website at: http://www.dfait-maeci.gc.ca/t |
|
Improvements in Canada’s Approach to Investment Measures since 1996 |
|||
|
Section |
Position at Base Year (1996) |
Cumulative Improvements Made to Date |
|
|
General Policy Framework |
Canada
relies heavily on foreign investment to further its economic development.
Foreign direct investment generates benefits to Canadian
communities through increased trade opportunities, the introduction of new
technologies and management practices, job creation, the payment of taxes and
the purchase of goods and services locally.
Canada actively seeks to promote its advantages as an investment
destination. Foreign investment
promotion is carried out by Investment Partnerships Canada. One
of the few remaining laws regulating foreign investment is the Investment
Canada Act (ICA). The stated purpose of the Act is to encourage investment in
Canada by Canadians and non-Canadians that contributes to economic growth and
employment opportunities and to provide for the review of significant
investments (i.e., acquisitions of control by non-Canadians of Canadian
businesses) in order to ensure such benefit to Canada. In most cases, the
establishment of a new business in Canada by an investor making its first
investment in Canada or the establishment of a new business by an existing
investor where the new business is unrelated to any existing business in
Canada is subject to a straightforward notification procedure, but is not
generally subject to review. The
Investment Canada Act provides for the review of significant acquisitions of
Canadian businesses. The Act
provides for the review of significant acquisitions of Canadian businesses
(i.e. in 1996, direct acquisitions of Canadian businesses worth more than
CDN$168 million) to ensure net benefit to Canada. The
acquisition of a Canadian business involved in the sensitive areas of
cultural industries (i.e., publication and distribution of books, magazines,
newspapers, videos, music recordings, etc.), financial services,
transportation services or uranium production is subject to the lower review
thresholds regardless of the nationality of the investor or vendor. The establishment of new businesses in
these cultural industries may be reviewable, if the Government so decides.
Reviewable investments are allowed to proceed if they are likely to be of
'net benefit' to Canada Please
see further detail of Canada’s current investment policy as described under
the Current Measures Section of this IAP chapter. In
1996, Canada was a signatory to the NAFTA which included substantive
investment provisions. In addition,
as of January 1996, Canada was party to eight (8) bilateral Foreign
Investment Protection Agreements (signed and in force): Poland, Argentina,
Russian Federation, Hungary, Czech and Slovak Republics, the Ukraine and
Latvia. |
The
threshold for review of foreign acquisitions under the
Investment Canada Act was $168 million in 1996. The review thresholds of the ICA are adjusted for inflation
every year.In 1999, the threshold was CDN$ 184 million, in 2000 it was CDN$
192 million, in 2001 it was CDN$ 209 million, in 2002 it was CDN$ 218 million
and in 2003 it is CDN$223 million. The
Canada-Chile Free Trade Agreement, which includes substantive provisions on
investment, entered into force on June 2, 1997. In addition, since 1996, 13 bilateral FIPAs were concluded and
entered into force: Armenia,
Barbados, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Egypt, Lebanon, Panama, the Philippines,
Romania, Thailand, Trinidad and Tobago, Uruguay, and Venezuela. |
|
|
Transparency |
In
1996, Canadian laws and regulations were readily
accessible from a number of sources including the Statutes of Canada,
Regulations of Canada and the Canada Gazette. They were also available to the public by request and in most
libraries throughout Canada. First
steps have been taken to make these laws and regulations available
electronically and through the internet. |
Significant progress has been made
since 1996 in enhancing the electronic and internet access for Canadian laws
and regulations. In
addition, extensive information on Canada’s investment policies and trade
agreements is now available through the following web-sites: http://www.dfait-maeci.gc.ca/t In 2001, Canada and its
NAFTA partners issued Notes of Interpretation in which they clarified that
they will make available to the public all documents submitted to or issued
by Chapter 11 tribunals, except in limited circumstances. |
|
|
Non-discrimination |
In
1996, Canada’s foreign investment laws were largely applied on an MFN and
national treatment basis. In
addition, Canada extended formal commitments in this regard through its WTO
and NAFTA obligations, as well as through its bilateral
investment agreements. Any
derogations from the principles of MFN and national treatment are clearly
identified in the NAFTA and Canada-Chile FTAs. See Canada’s entry in the
APEC Investment Guidebook for more details on exceptions to MFN. |
The
Canada-Chile Free Trade Agreement, which includes substantive provisions on
investment, entered into force on June 2, 1997. In addition, since 1996, 13 bilateral FIPAs were concluded and
entered into force. Derogations to
MFN and NT are clearly set out. In
1997, the government recognized the need to develop a new framework for the
entry of foreign banks in Canada. The
present framework offers foreign banks considerable flexibility to provide
financial services in Canada. They
may choose to do so through Canadian financial institutions and/or regulated
foreign bank branches. As well, a
foreign bank may establish more than one bank or more than one branch in
Canada. They are allowed to own both
wholesale and retail banks and full-service and lending branches. As well, foreign banks are permitted to
own the same range of investments as Canadian banks. In
2001, the Canada Business Corporations Act was amended to reduce the number
of required Canadian residents on the Boards of Directors of CBCA incorporated
companies from 50% to 25%. |
|
|
Expropriation and Compensation |
Both
at the federal and provincial levels, there exists legislation which gives
authority to expropriate for a public purpose in accordance with due process
of law, subject to compensation. In all circumstances, a
fair and equitable legal process is available to the expropriated party for
the determination of compensation. Authorities
first attempt to reach agreement on appropriate compensation, failing which
the action is subject to the judicial process. Compensation is based on fair
market value. Valuation criteria are determined by the courts and can include
such things as asset value, going concern value, and other criteria. |
The
Canada-Chile Free Trade Agreement, which includes substantive
provisions on investment, entered into force on June 2, 1997. In addition, since 1996, 13 bilateral
FIPAs were concluded and entered into force.
These agreements include provisions on expropriation and compensation. |
|
|
Protection from Strife and Similar Events |
In
the investment chapter of the NAFTA, Canada has committed to according to
investors of another Party, and to investments of investors of another Party,
non-discriminatory treatment with respect to measures it adopts of maintains
relating to losses suffered by investments in its
territory owing to armed conflict or civil strife. Canada
has also made commitments on compensation for losses within its bilateral
Foreign Investment Protection
Agreements. |
The
Canada-Chile Free Trade Agreement, which includes
substantive provisions on investment, entered into force on June 2,
1997. In addition, since 1996, 13
bilateral FIPAs were concluded and entered into force. These agreements include similar
provisions on strife. |
|
|
Transfers of Capital Related to Investments |
Canada
permits all transfers relating to investments to be made freely and without
delay. Please
see NAFTA Article 1109 for further details at:
http://www.dfait-maeci.gc.ca/n |
The
Canada-Chile Free Trade Agreement, which includes
substantive provisions on investment, entered into force on June 2,
1997. In addition, since 1996, 13
bilateral FIPAs were concluded and entered into force. These agreements include provisions on
transfer of capital. |
|
|
Performance Requirements |
Canada
adheres to the obligations of the WTO Agreement on Trade Related Investment
Measures. Canada made additional and
more rigorous commitments on performance requirements within the NAFTA. Canada also made performance requirements
commitments in each of its bilateral Foreign Investment Protection Agreements. |
The
Canada-Chile Free Trade Agreement, which includes substantive NFTA-style
provisions on investment, entered into force on June 2, 1997. In addition, since 1996, 13 bilateral FIPAs were concluded and entered into force. These agreements include obligations on
performance requirements. |
|
|
Entry and Stay of Personnel |
Please
visit Canada’s IAP chapter on Mobility of Business Persons. |
Please
visit Canada’s IAP chapter on Mobility of Business
Persons. |
|
|
Settlement of Disputes |
Foreign
and national investors have equal access to legal procedures in Canada. In addition, under the NAFTA as well as
the FIPAs, investment obligations may be enforced through both state-to-state
as well as investor-state dispute settlement mechanisms. Canada
is a party to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of the
Foreign Arbitral Awards (the "New York Convention") done at New
York June 10, 1958. It entered into
force for Canada on May 12, 1986. The
British Columbia International Arbitration Centre (Vancouver, B.C.) and the
Quebec National and International Commercial Arbitration Centre (Montreal,
Que) offer services that may be accessed by foreign investors. While
Canada has not signed or acceded to the ICSID Convention, Canada provides for
use of the ICSID Additional Facility Rules and the Arbitration Rules of
UNCITRAL in its bilateral investment agreements and in the NAFTA. |
Since
1996 the Canada-Chile Free Trade Agreement as well as eight
bilateral FIPAs have entered into force.
These agreements include both state-to- state and investor-state
dispute settlement provisions. |
|
|
Intellectual Property |
Canada
supports effective intellectual property rights protection, that provides
certainty and transparency to encourage marketing of
goods, services, technology and entertainment; investment in R&D and
innovation; and licensing arrangements (transfer of technology) to establish
or expand existing business investment.
Canada continues to improve intellectual property laws and their
administration, to ensure adequate protection for owners of intellectual
property, including effective mechanisms for enforcement of rights. |
Since
1996, significant progress has been made in enhancing the transparency of Canada’s intellectual property regime through Internet
access. Regarding
the administration and registration of intellectual property laws please
visit: http://cipo.gc.ca and
regarding intellectual property policies, please visit: http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/SSG/ http://www.pch.gc.ca/culture/c http://www.dfait-maeci.gc.ca/t |
|
|
Avoidance of Double Taxation |
Canada
has double taxation agreements in force with the following countries: Argentina, Australia, Austria, Bangladesh, Barbados,
Belgium, Brazil, Cameroon, Peoples Republic of China, Chile, Cyprus, Czech
Republic, Denmark, Dominican Republic, Egypt, Estonia, Finland, France,
Germany, Guyana, Hungary, Iceland, India, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Ivory
Coast, Jamaica, Japan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Republic of Korea, Latvia,
Lithuania, Malaysia, Malta, Mexico, Morocco, Netherlands, New Zealand,
Nigeria, Norway, Pakistan, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Poland, Romania,
Singapore, Slovakia, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sweden, Tanzania,
Thailand, Trinidad & Tobago, Tunisia, United Kingdom, United States, Zambia and Zimbabwe. |
The
following double taxation agreements entered into force since 1996: Algeria,
Austria, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Ecuador,
Germany, Jordan, Japan, Kyrgyzstan, Luxembourg, Moldova, Mongolia, Norway,
Peru, Portugal, Russia, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, Slovakia, Slovenia, Switzerland,
Vietnam and Indonesia. The
Protocol Amending the Tax Convention Between Canada and Australia came into
force December 30, 2002. |
|
|
Competition Policy and Regulatory Reform |
Canada's
principal laws aimed at the protection of competition are embodied in the
federal Competition Act. The Competition Act is a law of general application
which establishes basic principles for the conduct of
business in Canada. The purpose of the Act is to maintain and encourage
competition in Canada in order to promote the efficiency and adaptability of
the Canadian economy; expand opportunities for Canadian participation in
world markets while at the same time recognizing the role of foreign
competition in Canada; ensure that small and medium-sized enterprises have an
equitable opportunity to participate in the Canadian economy; and provide
consumers with competitive prices and product choices. All
mergers, whether involving foreign or domestic parties, which directly or
indirectly impact Canadian markets, are subject to review under the merger
provisions of the Competition Act.
This review determines whether or not the transaction is likely to
result in a substantial lessening or prevention of competition and could
ultimately result in an application before the Competition Tribunal for
remedial action. For
further information, please visit Chapter 8 of Canada’s IAP chapter on
Competition Policy or
http://competition.ic.gc.ca/ |
||
|
Business Facilitating
Measures to Improve the Domestic Business Environment |
In
June of 1996, the Canadian government introduced a new Investment
Strategy. This new strategy was
designed to increase efforts to attract foreign investment in Canada and to
facilitate the growth of globally competitive companies. |
The
website for Investment Partnerships Canada is continually being updated with
helpful information for potential investors.
For more information see http://investincanada.ic.gc.ca |
|